Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

  • Process for assigning reviews:

    • Aim for 4-6 reviewers per abstract

    • Start with specialized categories (e.g., aftercare, rehab)

    • Fill in more general categories (e.g., QI, pain) later

    • Balance workload across ~90 reviewers, aiming for ~24 reviews per person on average

 

Reviewer Management

  • Discussion on handling reviewers without assignments:

  • Some kept as backups for potential shortages

  • Importance of having up-to-date information on reviewer interests and expertise

  • Suggestion to create a more comprehensive catalog of reviewer expertise for future years

 

Abstract Categorization

  • Some abstracts may need recategorization during review process

  • Final adjustments to categories may be made during session slotting to balance talk numbers

  • No labels